Bismillah ir-Rahman ir-Rahim
Written: 20 Feb 2015
SOON MUCH MORE UPDATES & NEW
(last update 20 April 2015)
AlQaeda / Ahlus Sunnah VS IS / ISIS
We start with explaining that the reason we have been neutral till around
December 2014, it was to have a clear view, remove doubts, see proves, statements,
opinions from all sides.
If we wanted popularity, support, praise we would without doubt and blindly side
with ISIS, as it was getting popular, has immensely good organized media, its
supporters are very vocal and tech savvy.
But our goal is instead the TRUTH vs FALSEHOOD.
The problems between ISI began around
April 2013, when it ventured into Syria, and try to take Jahbat Al Nusra
(Mujahideen group affiliated with ISIS and Al Qaeda) under its direct command
naming itself ISIS. For various reasons ISIS wanted JAN to be disbanded and
enlisted into the ranks of ISIS, and JAN for various reasons wanted to keep
things how they were.
not seek permission from their Amir, Sheikh Ayman al-Zawahiri (hafidahullah) in
Sheikh Ayman said:
“Sheikh Abu Bakr al-Baqdadi al-Husayni erred by his announcement of an
Islamic State in Iraq and Sham without seeking our permission or without
Sheikh Zawahiri (Al Qaeda leader) for mediation
Both agreed to turn to Sheikh Zawahiri
(Al Qaeda leader) for mediation. His ruling :
The Islamic state in Iraq and Sham will be annulled and the work shall be
continued in the name of “Islamic state of Iraq.” Jabhat
- al-Nusra will be an independent branch of Al-Qaeda following the central
command (in khurasaan.) The space of work for the Islamic state of Iraq (ISI)
will be Iraq and the space of work for Jabhat al-Nusra will be Syria.”
ISIS denies agreeing to abide by Sheikh Ayman Zawahiri ruling
(For more info see
ISIS denies that it agreed and turned to
Sheikh Ayman Zawahiri for mediation and ruling.
But the proves and testimonies to expose their lies and deceit are below:
- Sheikh Abu Abdul Aziz al Qatari says Baghdadi agreed to abide by Sheikh Ayman
(If video player does
not show, reload page)
Shaykh Abu Sulayman al-Muhajir:
Al-Baghdadi said to me when we were
discussing how to solve the problem:
“If Shaykh Ayman commanded me to assign the issue of Sham to someone else I
would do so.” [End of his quote.]
Audio clip from part of the speech from
Shaykh Abu Abdullah al-Shaami, may Allah preserve him, about the judgment being
made by Shaykh Ayman al-Zawahari and the agreement of both parties.
“So we (the shura of Jabhat Al-Nusra) halted in obeying him (Sheikh
Al-Baghdadi) and decided to refer the matter to Sheikh Al-Zawahiri (may Allah
protect him), whereby both parties accept him as a judge and a decider in the
matter. In addition to this, the Sheikh (Al-Zawahiri) is the ameer (leader) of both of
us, so his ruling becomes binding from two aspects… (voice fading)”
-Shaykh Abu Abdullah Al-Shamee
Refusing Order as well as Denying
(For more info see LINK)
After refusing the order from their emir, it even went a step further denying it
had allegiance to Al-Qaeda. For this we refer to
Here one finds the proofs of the ba'yah
exposing the lies of the liar al-Adnani. Adnani lie (Message 11th May 2014):
"The State is not a branch that is
subordinate to Al-Qaeda, nor was it as such in any day"
It is important for our readers to read
the ba'yah section thoroughly, to learn and see the lies of ISIS. As it will
show what we have learned that this group is full of lies, deception and
Declaration of the Khalifah
(For more info
The next issue that arises are the declaration of the Khalifah.
Khalifah requires consultation, Allah
swt laws have wisdom beyond comparison, how abhorrent is
it to see ISIS supporters mock hadith by saying how can it be expected that the
Ummah be consulted. While there are different views if it is by everyone or majority,
there is the issue that at least what could have been done (if they were sincere)
is consult those who are already fighting for the Islamic cause, and the
Shariah of Allah swt, representatives and mujahideen of Afghanistan, Somalia,
Yemen, Caucasus, Syria etc.
being in the midst of fitnah with other mujahideen, they claim the Khalifah
elevating themselves for their own personal gain and power and use it as a tool
to mislead the people to follow and support their whims and desires. How can
they claim the Khalifah (Caliph) from a consultation of merely people who are local and
secret? And then try to annul the mujahideen groups world wide?
If they gained
their power by unknown locals who gave baya, who are in position of power,
knowledgeable ones and the people of
leaders, then their claim and power stays in that area! The other sincere groups
have understood that, and never tried to arrogantly elevate themselves above
others, and deny the rights given to them by Allah swt in Shariah. And we read and
understand in Sha Allah:
Umar radiallahu anhu said:
“If a man takes Bay’ah without consulting the Muslims, then there is
no Bay’ah to him and those who gave their Bay’ah are required to change him or
Narrated by al-Bukhari and he said:
“the governance among the Muslims is based on Shura
Imam Ahmed said:
“The Imam is the one whom all the Muslims are agreed to call him an Imam.”
Minhaj al-Sunnah 1:112
(Though we have to note that there is a valid difference of opinion whether all
of AhlulHal Wal-Aqd (people of might & strength) should agree or their majority would suffice for that.
Regardless of that, the Jama’at of al-Baghdadi has fulfilled neither of these two
conditions. On the contrary, majority of the Ahlul Hal Wal-Aqd are against them
if not all of them.)
Sheikhul Islam Ibn Thaymiyya rahimahullah said:
“If it was that Umar and those with him
gave Bay’at (to Abu Bakr
al-Siddiq) but the rest of the companions did not, then he would not be an Imam
by that. But rather he became the Imam only after the majority of the companions
gave him the Bay’at.”
Minhaj al-Sunnah 1:530
And he also said:
“When the people of might and strength gave Bay’at (to
Uthman), he became the Imam. If for example Abdur-Rahman ibn Auf gave him the
Bay’at but Ali and the other companions who are the people of might did not give
him Bay’at, he would not be an Imam.”
Minhaj al-Sunnah 1:533
Sheikh Abdul Aziz al-Tarifi hafidahullah said:
“It is not permissible for anyone to place his Jama’at as the pole
around which all the allegiance and enmity rotates such that he does not
see Bay’at or rulership except to that group. Whoever sees that way excluding
the rest of the believers, then, they are from those about whom Allah said:
إي َّن الَّيذي َن فَ َّرقُوا يدينَ ُه ْم َوَكانُوا يشيَ ًعا لَّ ْس َت يمْن ُه ْم
يفِ َش ْيء
Meaning: “Indeed, those who have divided their religion and become sects you, [O
Muhammad], are not [associated] with them in anything.”
Sheikh Abdul Aziz al-Tarifi said:
“If a group from the groups or those claiming the Bay’at, gather up and
claims the Bay’at for themselves, then this is not a conclusion from the
majority of the groups. For that reason, this is not considered a Shar’i Bay’at,
but rather an innovative (bid’i) Bay’at.”
“If this matter (of the general Bay’at) does not have the
agreement of the majority of the groups, then this is not considered a general
Bay’at but rather will be
authority over an army.”
(And not generally over the people)
And yet they justify their actions by claiming they want to unite the
Mujahideen, the Ummah. By what? By claiming power towards themselves? By
and fighting and killing them? By sowing the seeds of Fitnah not only limited to
Iraq/Syria but even Yemen, Afghanistan, Caucasus, Egypt, Libya etc. By dividing
the ranks, all for Ba'yah and power?
On the contrary they work to
fragment the ranks of those who strive for this religion, the Mujahideen,
and sabotage their groups that strive for the religion of Allah and pit their
followers against their emirs, and their students against their sheikhs!
Were does ISIS
Basically everything revolves around bayah and usurping power.
Anyone who does not support
them are labeled Murjia & deviants, just like recently they did so with AQ, AQIS,
AQAP, Taliban and Scholars of the Ummah.
The Muslim rights evaporate
if one does not give baya.
- Scholars are attacked, accused, slandered, the true scholar knowledge is
denied, but if given bayah then the most ignorant are promoted to their scholar
list like Abdullah Faisal.
The same Abdullah Faisal who claimed : "Any Muslim who does not give Bayah to
Islamic State is Munafiq & his wife becomes haram for him" and another time
declaring making Saudi woman concubines is halal.
One can only imagine how filthy and sick his mind is to make such claims, as
how shamelessly he to try to dishonor our Muslim sisters, and how corrupt,
deviant, evil to make halal that what is haram! But he is ISIS supporter so he
gets on their list of scholars, while for the real scholars they keep on slandering.
- No bayah, your blood becomes halal, see the
- No bayah, your religion gets annulled in
their eyes. (slandering of scholars)
- No bayah, your wife is haram
- No bayah, your wives, sisters, mothers, daughters can be taken as concubine.
Basically everything evolves about their bayah, their power, their self-interest!
Deceit / Lies / Deviant / Slanderous
They claim one thing to the masses for support but act the opposite way:
Claim they do not make takfeer of Mujahideen or general takfeer:
(For more info see
(If video player does not show, reload page)
ISIS Claims it does not want to fight Mujahideen but that others (Mujahideen) attack them:
(For more info see
(If video player does not
show, reload page)
Yet again lies and deceit popup from
their mouths claiming that rulings of scholars are responsible for bloodshed, and not their deviant beliefs, takfeer and bayah linked beliefs that make halal
what is haram, and haram what is halal by their so-called scholars like Abdullah
Faisal. How unfortunate that so many have been
misguided by their deceit and lies.
Lies about Iran and AlQaeda
"The ISIS has kept abiding by the advices and directives of the sheikhs and
figures of jihad. This is why the ISIS has not attacked the Rawafid in Iran
since its establishment. It has left the Rawafid safe in Iran, held back the
outrage of its soldiers, despite its ability, then, to turn Iran into
bloodbaths. It has kept its anger all these years and endured accusations of
collaboration with its worst enemy, Iran, for refraining from targeting it,
leaving the Rawafid there to live in safety, acting upon the orders of al Qaeda
to safeguard its interests and supply lines in Iran.
Let history record that Iran owes al Qaeda invaluably."
So who is stopping them now? Where are the bloodbaths in
Iran? It has been a year since (feb 2014) ISIS became completely separated of
AlQaeda, what is stopping them now? They exposed yet again another lie by
Sacrifice and Credibility
7th of March:
So look at Muhajirs and see what row they
are today. Do you think that they left homes & money to ruin Jihad? Or to fight
Jihad? Did they leave families to fight Mujahids or to fight Assad?
Indeed even though he is a deceiver and liar as we have proven, he makes a
point about the Muhajirun, and we have no doubt that many of them in ISIS ranks
came with good intentions but were deceived by the ISIS leadership. May Allah
swt guide us all. Ameen.
First point, the other groups have Muhajirun as well.
Which brings us to the next point, as Adnani uses the sacrifices and commitment
of the Muhajirs to defend his deviant group, it is only fair to also look
at the commitment and sacrifice of the leaders of the groups which is even more
important as they make the policies and give the orders and have the most
influence within their ranks what happens on the ground and what the goals are.
LEADERS OF ISIS:
Baghdadi : No history of Jihad before 9/11. No scholarly
credentials except an Islamic degree from a state run University.
Sheikh Abu Abdullah Mansoor, a mujahid commander from Iraq says:
“As for me, then I make my witness Allah besides whom none has the right to
be worshipped, due to what I know closely of this claimant who has named
himself Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and he studied from me alongside a group
virtuous [brothers] a little bit from the book “Zadul Mustaqni’” in the year
2005, and then the study discontinued because of my arrest.
I’ve come to know him accurately, he was of limited intelligence, slow at
grasping and dim witted, he’s not from the intermediate students of knowledge
and his study is that of an academic study in the state universities, those of
which the levels [of study] are ridiculous and have no relation in forming a
student of knowledge, let alone a scholar.”
Abu Ali Al Anbari : Loyal member of Saddam's Baath party till the very
end of the regime.
He is deputy of Baghdadi and runs IS operations in Syria. He is one of the
leading minds behind IS and holds much authority.
Abu Muslim Turkmani :
- He previously served in the military intelligence of the former Bathist regime
and then the Special Republican Guard a member
of Baath party till the end.
- Turkmani became one of Baghdadi’s deputies and was leader in charge of
Iraq. Anbari and Turkmani were considered the two most powerful leaders in IS.
Abu Aiman al Iraqi,
Another former officer of the Bathist regime, according to a report, Abu Ayman
held position of Lieutenant Colonel. He was one of IS key commanders who helped
recruit many fighters
that formed its foundation in Syria. He led its fighters in many parts of Syria
notably in Latakkia area before IS withdrew from that front.
Wali of DeiralZour
under Baghdadi. He then went to Deir az-Zour where he led battles against the
According to Sheikh Saqr (who was a companion of Sheikh Azzam and Usama), Abu
Ayman said the following words to a group of commanders who called a meeting
want the Shariah of the jungle”.
Salman al Arjani who himself has joined IS
has confirmed that he heard the statement from Abu Ayman. He is also notorious
for personally killing a commander called Abu Baseer.
Abu Jihad al Shishani. The man caught whose lying has been exposed
clearly by Islamic Emirate of Caucasus.
Haji Bakr : A former air force colonel in the Bathist regime, he was noted as a brilliant
military strategist. He was arrested by the Americas after the invasion of Iraq.
He joined the resistance and was a member of ISI. Upon the martyrdom of Abu Umar
al Baghdadi he was one of those who facilitated the rise of Abu Bakr al
Baghdadi. It is alleged that he was he was the mastermind of a string of
assassinations targeting commanders opposed to Abu Bakr al Baghdadi and that he
was the chief architect of Baghdadis rise to leadership.
When Jabhat an-Nusra (JAN) was founded he went to Syria as one of its military
leaders. When Baghdadi announced the State in Syria, he defected and re-joined
LEADERS OF JAN:
Sheikh Abu Julaybib (Anas Sahaba) :
From Jordan, he made hijra to Iraq and fought as one of Sheikh Zarqawi’s most
He is currently leader of Jabhat an-Nusra in the southern Syria which includes
Dar`a and Qunaitra which borders occupied Palestine.
Sheikh Abu Muhammad al Jawlani :
He is a Syrian who has previously fought in Iraq and was captured and imprisoned
by the Americans in Iraq. He spent time in the ‘school
of Yusuf (as)’-prison, revising and studying the jihadi movement.
On being released he returned to the jihad in Iraq. After the revolution in
Syria, he returned to Syria with a handful of individuals and founded Jabhat
Sheikh Sami Uraydi.
He was born 1973 in Amman, Jordan. He received his Bachelor’s degree in Islamic
Shari'ah from the University of Jordon in the year 1994 and received a
Magistrate degree in Hadith in the year 1997 from the same university. He then
received Doctorate in Hadith in the Islamic University of Baghdad, Iraq.
He is currently serving as head Sharia advisor in Jabhat anNusra.
Sheikh Abu Firas as-Suri:
Born in 1949, Damascus. He joined the military academy and left because of his
Islamic views. He was a trainer between 1977-1980 to the
Mujahideen in At-Tali'a Al-Muqatila and he participated in many
operations against the [Syrian] regime between the years of 1979-1980. In 1980
he moved to Jordan and the following year he left for Afghanistan where he
trained the Mujahideen in several military sciences at various training
camps in Khorasaan.
While in Afghanistan, Shaykh Abu Firas met the two Shaykhs, Shaykh Abdullah
‘Azzam and Shaykh ‘Usamah ibn Ladin (in 1983), he continued to train theMujahideen
in specially prepared camps to carry out operations in; India, Indonesia,
Burma and Iran.
Shaykh Abu Firas participated in military operations in Khost and Jalaabad and
he was active in participating in the Shura charged with reconciling the
differences among the Mujahideen of Afghanistan.
He also had a leading role among the mujahideen in Afghanistan and Pakistan
where he met Sheikh Abu Mus`ab Zarqawi. At the time of the American invasion he
was tasked of securing the families of the mujahideen. He migrated to Yemen
where he remained until migrating back to Sham to participate in the Jihad. He
is currently the spokesperson of Jabhat an-Nusra and a senior Shura council
Sheikh Abu Maria al Qahtani
Real name, Maysara al Juburi from the village of Harar in Iraq. He participated
in the Jihad of Iraq and was imprisoned. In prison he studied under the
Ulamaa.He was from the first group of Mujahideen that crossed over from Iraq to
Syria alongside Sheikh Jawlani. Abu Maria was one of the founding members of
Jabhat an-Nusra and was the second most powerful person in the group.
He served as head of Sharia affairs but later handed over the job to Sheikh Sami
Uraydi. He led the mujahideen in the eastern Deir az-Zour region but after its
fall he is relocated to Dar`a province.
Commander Abu Humam as-Suri
aka Farooq as-Suri
He travelled to Afghanistan in the nineties, between the years 1998-1999 he
joined the AlGhuraba training camp of Shaykh Abu Musa'ab al-Suri for a year
before moving on to Qandahar’s famous Al-Farouq training camp, he graduated as
one of its best. Abu Hamam also worked as a trainer in Al-Farouq camp, where he
gave Baya'a to Shaykh Osama bin Laden by shaking hands with the Shaykh may Allah
have Mercy on him and
Abu Hamam was made responsible for the Muhajireen from Sham in Afghanistan and
was the one who watched after their affairs in Khorasan. He participated in most
of the battles
which occurred and took place after the Crusader’s invasion of Afghanistan.
He was with Shaykh Sayf al-Adl until Shaykh Mustafa Abu al-Yazid ordered him to
work in Iraq before the fall of Baghdad, where he stayed for about four months,
as an official representative of Tandheem Qaidat al-Jihad from the leadership in
During that period, he met Shaykh Abu Musa'ab al-Zarqawi, and Shaykh and Abu
Hamza alMuhajir. While in Iraq, the Iraqi intelligence arrested him and handed
him to the Syrians who later released him as nothing was affirmed against him.
After the beginning of Jihad in Iraq, he was assigned as the military leader in
the office of Mujahideen services, Abu Musaa'b al-Zarqawi used to send his Amirs
to receive training from Abu Hamam before returning to him.
After the beginning of the brutal campaign of arrests in Syria in 2005 at the
hands of the Nusayris, he went to Lebanon, then to Afghanistan per the order of
the mashayekh there. He was ordered by Shaykh Atiyat Allah, who was responsible
for all foreign operations then, to work inside Syria and directly report to
He was arrested in Lebanon and jailed for five years. After he was released, he
joined, Jabhat al-Nusra. He now holds the position of the Military Commander of
LEADERS OF OTHER MUJAHID GROUPS
Ahrar al Sham : Many of its leaders
were prominent members of Salafi movement in Syria imprisoned by Assad before
revolution and some had active part in Iraqi Jihad. Its leader Abu Aiman al
Hamawi was a close companion of Zarqawi(rh) and was the one who wrote the famous
statement of the allegiance of Jamat ul Tawhid wal Jihad to Alqaeda. Abu Yazan
al Shami according to one account was requested by AQ in Iraq to make Hijra to
become a judge but was arrested. Abu Khalid al Suri(rh) started his Jihad from
the time of Sh Abdullah Azzam(rh) and continued to be in companionship of Osama
bin Laden, Abu Musab al Suri, Zarqawi and others.
JundulAqsa : Formed by Shaykh Abdul Aziz Qatari(rh) with a
history of Jihad dating back to the time of Sh Abdullah Azzam(rh).
JunduSham : Formed by Muslim al Shishani who was a prominent
leader from the time of Khattab(rh) in Chechen Jihad.
JMWA : The leadership of JMWA similarly has history of
participation in Syrian Jihad.
Harakat ul Sham al Islam : This group was formed by Shaykh Abu
Ahmed al Maghribi who migrated to Afghanistan during 1990s, was also imprisoned
in Guantanamo bay.
AnsarulIslam fi Sham : This is Syrian branch of Iraqi Jihadi
group Ansar ul Islam. This was the oldest Jihadi group in Iraq which also gave
refuge to Zarqawi before US invasion began. Its leadership of past and present
has similar history of participation in Jihad and activism against Bathist
Jabhat al Nusrah : This group has countless such individuals
but among the most prominent known leaders include ex-military leader Abu Hammam
al Suri who was among the top graduates of AQ's farouq camps and held
responsibilities in Iraq and elsewhere, Abu Firas al Suri who started his Jihad
in 1970s against Syrian Bathist regime then moved to Afghanistan and later
participated in Jihad of Yemen and elsewhere. Abu Yusuf al Turki , the famous
sniper who trained many in Afgh/Pak, Snafi al Nasr and many others.
At the end, I would also like to clarify that right of repentance is for
everyone including Saddam's ex-generals.
By far most of the evidence we present are clear proof, but since they have
proven to blatantly lie and slander, thus it makes it important to look also at the character, reliability
of the persons involved. ISIS wants us to believe all the Mujahideen and
them are all liars, many of whom have spent many years in Jihad even before
Syria, they all turned overnight liars, and that ISIS who we have been exposed lying
above, are telling the truth.
IS as it stands today does fight against the Kuffar and in that we should
prefer them over kuffar. But this does not take away the fact that their
intention is to aggress against other Mujahidin and they have done it countless
times. It also doesn't take away the fact that they have made takfir of
Mujahidin groups as testified by Amir of JaishulMuhajirin wal Ansar.
NOTE: Dear brothers and sisters, there is a
saying going from ISIS as well as their supporters that "we do not follow
scholars" and "that nothing can be taken from
scholars (or reliable) who are in the west, in prisons or living in lands ruled
by Taghut" then what was your Islam before ISIS, from who did you take
knowledge from? And I add we should not follow scholars blindly. But true scholars
are to be followed as they know the rulings, the Sunnah and Quran in depth, with
right context and relevance. This coming from ISIS leaders is understandable
since many converted recently (from Bhaatism). It is merely a trick of them to
deviate you from the right path, as true scholars warn against them, so they try
to create distance between you and these scholars. And I am not talking about
scholars who support Taghut, but the scholars who made big sacrifices and
stood firm in the face of these Tawaghit and proven themselves! These are the
scholars being slandered, these are the scholars who are overnight all declared
deviant by ISIS. This so you follow the deviance of ISIS and so you don't listen
or pay attention to the warning, teachings and advice of what the Ulema teach
And we do not and never will accept their threats of
slander and accusations when one speaks against their (ISIS) crimes. Like the
Zionists (so-called Israel) call who ever speaks against their crimes terrorist
sympathizers or terrorist supporters so does ISIS accuse who ever speaks against
its crimes of supporting Taghut or label them Murjia
& deviants or worse make takfeer on them. We reject this! Their tongue is sharp,
but their accusations baseless!
Hate for Jahbat al-Nusrah
The hate of ISIS against JAN can be
summarized by accusation of ISIS of JAN breaking bayah to them, and separating
themselves. But those who have read all our proves will see through this deception
and lies and will see, it was ISIS breaking bayah, deviating and JAN took
courageous stance of loyalty towards their emir Sheikh Zawahiri who was also the
emir of ISIS until they betrayed him. JAN refused to betray and break bayah, and
refused to stand by ISIS in its deviation and betrayal, in its slandering of
scholars and killing of Muslims. May Allah swt reward JAN who upheld their bayah,
who refused to be a partner in the crimes of ISIS. Jahnbat al-Nusrah are indeed
the most slandered group by ISIS with countless lies. It is shame so many have
fallen for lies towards a group who is in its right, and believed the liar who
is in the wrong.
The time will be
years of confusion. People will believe a liar, and disbelieve one who tells the
truth. People will distrust one who is trustworthy, and trust one who is
May Allah swt protect our brothers of Jahbat al-Nusrah.
(For more complate detailed info see LINK)
This page contains articles, testimonies, videos, books exposing the deviance of the ISIS sect, its lies, deception and crimes. One will see their self made Shariah, selective implementation if Shariah, making Muslim blood halal what is haram, making up terms like "dogs of Allah" (astagfirullah) claiming the Prophet SAW would follow them (astagfirullah) refusing the Muslim to pray (wala hawla wala quwwata illa billah), happy to go against the commands of Allah SWT
and the Prophet SAW by boasting to wanting to kill with a blunt knife and much more.
(If video player does not show, reload page)
Dear brothers and sisters, please read and think, who
are the ones that are being slandered, made takfeer upon, accused of deviance,
see above the sacrifices, their fight for Islam and the Ummah, how big part of
their lives have been lead. These are the ones who are slandered, accused,
vilified and made takfeer on !
And by who? The people who only some years back converted to Islam, who before
dedicated their lives to Baathism, fought Islam and the Muslims, who proclaimed
to be superior by their Baathist ideology over Islam and Muslims!! Now those
same ones have converted to Islam (Alhamdulillah) now again make the claim
of being superior over other Muslims! There is a pattern! They justify their
misguidance by lies and deceit! Dear brothers and sisters hold on to the truth
and do not fall for their traps.
Other Notes :
There are several points of criticism of ISIS that we do not agree on:
- The Kobani / Ein al Islam Operation, many say it was futile, senseless, no
strategic importance for ISIS to commit to heavily their and lose so many of its
fighters. The matter of military operation like these, one should not jump to
conclusions like these in our opinion as it is their strategy, with their
own goals and aims, and their own planning's and vision. Perhaps they saw
benefit in taking the area, perhaps they needed it, perhaps they had many other
reasons. It is up to themselves to make their own strategy and decisions on the
battlefield what they think is beneficiary to them and their goals.
- Why did we then bring up attack on Iran? Because Adnani accused and slandered
AQ, made claims, so he himself brought up the issue and exposed his own lies.
- Criticism of ISIS not attacking the so-called 'israel'. Again, its their own
strategy, besides the tons on reasons we can think of we keep it short, their
other battles going on, their other battle fronts, attacking this evil Zionist
entity requires planning and huge resources so it not to be futile but really to
achieve victory, the ones who come with such criticism should re-think what they
- Burning of Jordanian Pilot, we basically don't care about the soldier of
Taghut, even though we made clear we don't agree with burning as punishment, he
is not worth debating, what does matter is that ISIS used our sister Sajida al-Rishawi
as PR and propaganda tool to promote their own interest, which made her a target
for the Jordanians to retaliate against her by executing her. Sheikh Maqdisi who
was negotiating to have her swapped against the pilot was lied to from the
beginning as the pilot was killed within first week of capture, so there was
nothing to swap or negotiate, only for ISIS to run a propaganda campaign as if
it cares for the Muslims and their blood. And after the execution of our dear
sister it is clear how much ISIS supporters value Muslim blood, when they
declared that she is better of death then in the prisons of the Taghut. Making
it seem like they did her a favor by getting her killed. SubhanAllah, how they
make Muslim blood cheap. May Allah swt reward Sheikh Maqdisi for his efforts
to help our sister Sajida. The same noble sheikh who is slandered and accused by
these ISIS for speaking against them, for being justifiable angry after being
lied and deceived by ISIS. But we expect nothing less anymore from ISIS.
- Regarding treatment of minorities by ISIS, this we see
by far not being a priority, especially with the reality and facts on the ground
were the minorities are the ones keeping Assad in power, supporting him with
genocide against the Muslims in Syria. The other reason is that when it comes to
minorities like the Kurds, their evil communist atheist leaders and groups have
been caught often with propaganda and lies as well as social media and
mainstream media who have published most ridiculous stories that have been
proven to be lies.
Q- Do we hate ISIS
A- No, we do not hate ISIS, our problem with ISIS is its deceit and lies, its
takfeer and killing of Mujahideen, its power hungry methodology, its deviant
Q- You don't want a Khilafah?
A- Off course we want and support the establishment of the Khilafah, which will
be on the Prophets SAW methodology following the Quran and Sunnah, and not based
on methodology of power hungry Takfiris, Khariji, Bhaatists, and other misguided
people who break bayah, lie, deceit, slander, kill Muslims, usurp rights of the
Q- Why silent so long?
A. We wanted to have all facts, we hoped for reconciliation between the groups,
we wanted to be sure of certain issues. The other reason is, the story was 1
sided, with ISIS being very vocal and the other side very silent. This silence
from the other side was to not make this fitnah bigger, to try to defuse it. But
the effects were the opposite, by which ISIS got more support, confident, and
groups started joining it, thinking it was the side that was right since they
did not hear from the other side. See article explaining this:
Muslim Abu Walid Shishani's Statement on the Fitna in Syria
We did get reports from brothers on the ground, telling about the takfeeri acts
of ISIS soldiers. At ISIS checkpoints after discussion they did takfeer on these
Muhajirun, this is way before the fighting between JAN and ISIS started, early
stages of the fitnah. But we hoped these were just isolated incidents. We got
other reports, but we made excuses, for us it was a matter of it is better to be
silent then to say things that might not be true.
Once things did get clear, we did our best to make an all inclusive piece on this
issue, but such things take a lot of time, and work, even though it might seem
easy on apparent.
Q- What is our stance on the Kurds who are fighting ISIS?
A- They are mostly if not all communists, atheist and the like of, so we have
nothing but enmity towards them.
We do not support any Tahgut, Kafir against ISIS.
ARTICLES OF HIGH INTEREST:
Article_A COLLECTION OF THE WORDS OF THE ULAMA REGARDING DAWLAH
The Ruling of Giving Oath of Allegiance (bay'ah) to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (ISIS)
by sheikh al-'Alwaan
A Testimony to save/preserve Blood of the Mujahideen in Sham
Article_A Call to the Ummah & Mujahideen
Article_Between az-Zarqawi & IS(IS)
Article_Claim of IS to Global Jihad
Article_Takfeer_How is Group IS Takfir in black & white wrong when compared to
Article_Meaning of Hadith_Oh Allah, bless us in our Syria
- Article_This is Their Manhaj
Article_Letter from Ansar al-Islam
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED PDF's , it
gives a clear picture of whole situation:
Clearing the allegations against Ahlul-Jihad and clarifying the errors of
- Reality of ISIS
The Reality Behind the IS
cloak of The Khalifa
Declaration Disownment Divergence
May Allah swt guide us all, and give strength and victory to this Ummah.